<?xml version = '1.0' encoding = 'UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss/styledrssBMC.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:extra="http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/schemas/extra/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/">
	<channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/rss">
		<extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
			<html:div xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">
				<html:span style="font-weight:bold">This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central</html:span>
				<html:br/>
				<html:span style="font-size: 12px;">It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit <html:br/><html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/</html:a><html:br/>
				</html:span>
			</html:div>
		</extra:info>
		<title>Emerging Themes in Epidemiology - Most viewed articles</title>
		<link>http://www.ete-online.commostviewed/</link>
		<description>Most viewed articles in last 30 days from Emerging Themes in Epidemiology (ISSN 1742-7622) published by 
				
				BioMed Central
		</description>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
         <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ete-online.com/content/5/1/6"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ete-online.com/content/2/1/7"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ete-online.com/content/3/1/16"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ete-online.com/content/2/1/1"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ete-online.com/content/5/1/9"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ete-online.com/content/5/1/11"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ete-online.com/content/2/1/11"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ete-online.com/content/5/1/2"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ete-online.com/content/5/1/8"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ete-online.com/content/4/1/3"/>			    
            
            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
    </channel>
    
		<item rdf:about="http://www.ete-online.com/content/5/1/6">
            
            <title>Precision, time, and cost: a comparison of three sampling designs in an emergency setting</title>
			<description>The conventional method to collect data on the health, nutrition, and food security status of a population affected by an emergency is a 30 &#215; 30 cluster survey. This sampling method can be time and resource intensive and, accordingly, may not be the most appropriate one when data are needed rapidly for decision making. In this study, we compare the precision, time and cost of the 30 &#215; 30 cluster survey with two alternative sampling designs: a 33 &#215; 6 cluster design (33 clusters, 6 observations per cluster) and a 67 &#215; 3 cluster design (67 clusters, 3 observations per cluster). Data for each sampling design were collected concurrently in West Darfur, Sudan in September-October 2005 in an emergency setting. Results of the study show the 30 &#215; 30 design to provide more precise results (i.e. narrower 95% confidence intervals) than the 33 &#215; 6 and 67 &#215; 3 design for most child-level indicators. Exceptions are indicators of immunization and vitamin A capsule supplementation coverage which show a high intra-cluster correlation. Although the 33 &#215; 6 and 67 &#215; 3 designs provide wider confidence intervals than the 30 &#215; 30 design for child anthropometric indicators, the 33 &#215; 6 and 67 &#215; 3 designs provide the opportunity to conduct a LQAS hypothesis test to detect whether or not a critical threshold of global acute malnutrition prevalence has been exceeded, whereas the 30 &#215; 30 design does not. For the household-level indicators tested in this study, the 67 &#215; 3 design provides the most precise results. However, our results show that neither the 33 &#215; 6 nor the 67 &#215; 3 design are appropriate for assessing indicators of mortality. In this field application, data collection for the 33 &#215; 6 and 67 &#215; 3 designs required substantially less time and cost than that required for the 30 &#215; 30 design. The findings of this study suggest the 33 &#215; 6 and 67 &#215; 3 designs can provide useful time- and resource-saving alternatives to the 30 &#215; 30 method of data collection in emergency settings.</description>
			<link>http://www.ete-online.com/content/5/1/6</link>		
			<dc:creator>Megan Deitchler, Hedwig Deconinck and Gilles Bergeron</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>Emerging Themes in Epidemiology 2008, 5:6</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 770</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-05-02</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1742-7622-5-6</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Emerging Themes in Epidemiology</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1742-7622</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-02</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.ete-online.com/content/2/1/7">
            
            <title>Assessing influenza-related mortality: Comment on Zucs et al.</title>
			<description>None</description>
			<link>http://www.ete-online.com/content/2/1/7</link>		
			<dc:creator>Jonathan Dushoff</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>Emerging Themes in Epidemiology 2005, 2:7</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 549</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2005-07-21</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1742-7622-2-7</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Emerging Themes in Epidemiology</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1742-7622</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2005-07-21</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.ete-online.com/content/3/1/16">
            
            <title>Ethical issues in epidemiologic research and public health practice</title>
			<description>A rich and growing body of literature has emerged on ethics in epidemiologic research and public health practice. Recent articles have included conceptual frameworks of public health ethics and overviews of historical developments in the field. Several important topics in public health ethics have also been highlighted. Attention to ethical issues can facilitate the effective planning, implementation, and growth of a variety of public health programs and research activities. Public health ethics is consistent with the prevention orientation of public health. Ethical concerns can be anticipated or identified early and effectively addressed through careful analysis and consultation.</description>
			<link>http://www.ete-online.com/content/3/1/16</link>		
			<dc:creator>Steven S Coughlin</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>Emerging Themes in Epidemiology 2006, 3:16</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 500</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2006-10-03</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1742-7622-3-16</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Emerging Themes in Epidemiology</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1742-7622</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>16</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2006-10-03</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.ete-online.com/content/2/1/1">
            
            <title>Dengue fever: new paradigms for a changing epidemiology</title>
			<description>Dengue is the most important arthropod-borne viral disease of public health significance. Compared with nine reporting countries in the 1950s, today the geographic distribution includes more than 100 countries worldwide. Many of these had not reported dengue for 20 or more years and several have no known history of the disease. The World Health Organization estimates that more than 2.5 billion people are at risk of dengue infection. First recognised in the 1950s, it has become a leading cause of child mortality in several Asian and South American countries.This paper reviews the changing epidemiology of the disease, focusing on host and societal factors and drawing on national and regional journals as well as international publications. It does not include vaccine and vector issues. We have selected areas where the literature raises challenges to prevailing views and those that are key for improved service delivery in poor countries.Shifts in modal age, rural spread, and social and biological determinants of race- and sex-related susceptibility have major implications for health services. Behavioural risk factors, individual determinants of outcome and leading indicators of severe illness are poorly understood, compromising effectiveness of control programmes. Early detection and case management practices were noted as a critical factor for survival. Inadequacy of sound statistical methods compromised conclusions on case fatality or disease-specific mortality rates, especially since the data were often based on hospitalised patients who actively sought care in tertiary centres.Well-targeted operational research, such as population-based epidemiological studies with clear operational objectives, is urgently needed to make progress in control and prevention.</description>
			<link>http://www.ete-online.com/content/2/1/1</link>		
			<dc:creator>Debarati Guha-Sapir and Barbara Schimmer</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>Emerging Themes in Epidemiology 2005, 2:1</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 406</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2005-03-02</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1742-7622-2-1</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Emerging Themes in Epidemiology</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1742-7622</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2005-03-02</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.ete-online.com/content/5/1/9">
            
            <title>(Errors in statistical tests)3</title>
			<description>In 2004, Garcia-Berthou and Alcaraz published "Incongruence between test statistics and P values in medical papers," a critique of statistical errors that received a tremendous amount of attention. One of their observations was that the final reported digit of p-values in articles published in the journal Nature departed substantially from the uniform distribution that they suggested should be expected. In 2006, Jeng critiqued that critique, observing that the statistical analysis of those terminal digits had been based on comparing the actual distribution to a uniform continuous distribution, when digits obviously are discretely distributed. Jeng corrected the calculation and reported statistics that did not so clearly support the claim of a digit preference. However delightful it may be to read a critique of statistical errors in a critique of statistical errors, we nevertheless found several aspects of the whole exchange to be quite troubling, prompting our own meta-critique of the analysis.The previous discussion emphasized statistical significance testing. But there are various reasons to expect departure from the uniform distribution in terminal digits of p-values, so that simply rejecting the null hypothesis is not terribly informative. Much more importantly, Jeng found that the original p-value of 0.043 should have been 0.086, and suggested this represented an important difference because it was on the other side of 0.05. Among the most widely reiterated (though often ignored) tenets of modern quantitative research methods is that we should not treat statistical significance as a bright line test of whether we have observed a phenomenon. Moreover, it sends the wrong message about the role of statistics to suggest that a result should be dismissed because of limited statistical precision when it is so easy to gather more data.In response to these limitations, we gathered more data to improve the statistical precision, and analyzed the actual pattern of the departure from uniformity, not just its test statistics. We found variation in digit frequencies in the additional data and describe the distinctive pattern of these results. Furthermore, we found that the combined data diverge unambiguously from a uniform distribution. The explanation for this divergence seems unlikely to be that suggested by the previous authors: errors in calculations and transcription.</description>
			<link>http://www.ete-online.com/content/5/1/9</link>		
			<dc:creator>Carl V Phillips, Richard F MacLehose and Jay S Kaufman</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>Emerging Themes in Epidemiology 2008, 5:9</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 340</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-07-14</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1742-7622-5-9</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Emerging Themes in Epidemiology</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1742-7622</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-14</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.ete-online.com/content/5/1/11">
            
            <title>Widespread rape does not directly appear to increase the overall HIV prevalence in conflict-affected countries: so now what?</title>
			<description>Background:
Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is severely affected by HIV/AIDS and conflict. Sexual violence as a weapon of war has been associated with concerns about heightened HIV incidence among women. Widespread rape by combatants has been documented in Burundi, Sierra Leone, Rwanda, Democratic Republic of Congo, Liberia, Sudan and Uganda. To examine the assertion that widespread rape may not directly increase HIV prevalence at the population level, we built a model to determine the potential impact of varying scenarios of widespread rape on HIV prevalence in the above seven African countries.DiscussionOur findings show that even in the most extreme situations, where 15% of the female population was raped, where HIV prevalence among assailants was 8 times the country population prevalence, and where the HIV transmission rate was highest at 4 times the average high rate, widespread rape increased the absolute HIV prevalence of these countries by only 0.023%. These projections support the finding that widespread rape in conflict-affected countries in SSA has not incurred a major direct population-level change in HIV prevalence. However, this must not be interpreted to say that widespread rape does not pose serious problems to women's acquisition of HIV on an individual basis or in specific settings. Furthermore, direct and indirect consequences of sexual violence, such as physical and psychosocial trauma, unwanted pregnancies, and stigma and discrimination cannot be understated.SummaryThe conclusions of this article do not significantly change current practices in the field from an operational perspective. Proper care and treatment must be provided to every survivor of rape regardless of the epidemiological effects of HIV transmission at the population level. Sexual violence must be treated as a protection issue and not solely a reproductive health and psychosocial issue. It is worth publishing data and conclusions that could be misconstrued and may not make much of a programmatic difference in the field. Data, if collected, analysed and interpreted carefully, help to improve our understanding of complicated and nuanced situations. Ultimately, our understanding of what the outcomes of such interventions can achieve will be more realistic. It also helps decision-makers prioritise their funding and interventions.</description>
			<link>http://www.ete-online.com/content/5/1/11</link>		
			<dc:creator>Aranka Anema, Michel R Joffres, Edward Mills and Paul B Spiegel</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>Emerging Themes in Epidemiology 2008, 5:11</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 327</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-07-29</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1742-7622-5-11</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Emerging Themes in Epidemiology</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1742-7622</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-29</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.ete-online.com/content/2/1/11">
            
            <title>The Bradford Hill considerations on causality: a counterfactual perspective</title>
			<description>Bradford Hill's considerations published in 1965 had an enormous influence on attempts to separate causal from non-causal explanations of observed associations. These considerations were often applied as a checklist of criteria, although they were by no means intended to be used in this way by Hill himself. Hill, however, avoided defining explicitly what he meant by "causal effect".This paper provides a fresh point of view on Hill's considerations from the perspective of counterfactual causality. I argue that counterfactual arguments strongly contribute to the question of when to apply the Hill considerations. Some of the considerations, however, involve many counterfactuals in a broader causal system, and their heuristic value decreases as the complexity of a system increases; the danger of misapplying them can be high. The impacts of these insights for study design and data analysis are discussed. The key analysis tool to assess the applicability of Hill's considerations is multiple bias modelling (Bayesian methods and Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis); these methods should be used much more frequently.</description>
			<link>http://www.ete-online.com/content/2/1/11</link>		
			<dc:creator>Michael H&#246;fler</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>Emerging Themes in Epidemiology 2005, 2:11</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 295</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2005-11-03</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1742-7622-2-11</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Emerging Themes in Epidemiology</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1742-7622</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2005-11-03</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.ete-online.com/content/5/1/2">
            
            <title>Simpson's Paradox, Lord's Paradox, and Suppression Effects are the same phenomenon &#8211; the reversal paradox</title>
			<description>This article discusses three statistical paradoxes that pervade epidemiological research: Simpson's paradox, Lord's paradox, and suppression. These paradoxes have important implications for the interpretation of evidence from observational studies. This article uses hypothetical scenarios to illustrate how the three paradoxes are different manifestations of one phenomenon &#8211; the reversal paradox &#8211; depending on whether the outcome and explanatory variables are categorical, continuous or a combination of both; this renders the issues and remedies for any one to be similar for all three. Although the three statistical paradoxes occur in different types of variables, they share the same characteristic: the association between two variables can be reversed, diminished, or enhanced when another variable is statistically controlled for. Understanding the concepts and theory behind these paradoxes provides insights into some controversial or contradictory research findings. These paradoxes show that prior knowledge and underlying causal theory play an important role in the statistical modelling of epidemiological data, where incorrect use of statistical models might produce consistent, replicable, yet erroneous results.</description>
			<link>http://www.ete-online.com/content/5/1/2</link>		
			<dc:creator>Yu-Kang Tu, David Gunnell and Mark S Gilthorpe</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>Emerging Themes in Epidemiology 2008, 5:2</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 184</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-01-22</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1742-7622-5-2</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Emerging Themes in Epidemiology</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1742-7622</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-01-22</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.ete-online.com/content/5/1/8">
            
            <title>Persisting with prevention: The importance of adherence for HIV prevention</title>
			<description>Background:
Only four out of 31 completed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of HIV prevention strategies against sexual transmission have shown significant efficacy. Poor adherence may have contributed to the lack of effect in some of these trials. In this paper we explore the impact of various levels of adherence on measured efficacy within an RCT.AnalysisWe used simple quantitative methods to illustrate the impact of various levels of adherence on measured efficacy by assuming a uniform population in terms of sexual behavior and the binomial model for the transmission probability per partnership.At 100% adherence the measured efficacy within an RCT is a reasonable approximation of the true biological efficacy. However, as adherence levels fall, the efficacy measured within a trial substantially under-estimates the true biological efficacy. For example, at 60% adherence, the measured efficacy can be less than half of the true biological efficacy.
Conclusion:
Poor adherence during a trial can substantially reduce the power to detect an effect, and improved methods of achieving and maintaining high adherence within trials are needed. There are currently 12 ongoing HIV prevention trials, all but one of which require ongoing user-adherence. Attention must be given to methods of maximizing adherence when piloting and designing RCTs and HIV prevention programmes.</description>
			<link>http://www.ete-online.com/content/5/1/8</link>		
			<dc:creator>Helen A Weiss, Judith N Wasserheit, Ruanne V Barnabas, Richard J Hayes and Laith J Abu-Raddad</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>Emerging Themes in Epidemiology 2008, 5:8</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 184</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-07-11</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1742-7622-5-8</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Emerging Themes in Epidemiology</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1742-7622</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-11</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.ete-online.com/content/4/1/3">
            
            <title>Age standardisation &#8211; an indigenous standard?</title>
			<description>The study of inequities in health is a critical component of monitoring government obligations to uphold the rights of Indigenous Peoples. In Aotearoa/New Zealand the indigenous M&#257;ori population has a substantially younger age structure than the non-indigenous population making it necessary to account for age differences when comparing population health outcomes. An age-standardised rate is a summary measure of a rate that a population would have if it had a standard age structure. Changing age standards have stimulated interest in the potential impact of population standards on disparities data and consequently on health policy.This paper compares the age structure of the M&#257;ori and non-M&#257;ori populations with two standard populations commonly used in New Zealand: Segi's world and WHO world populations. The performance of these standards in M&#257;ori and non-M&#257;ori mortality data was then measured against the use of the M&#257;ori population as a standard. It was found that the choice of population standard affects the magnitude of mortality rates, rate ratios and rate differences, the relative ranking of causes of death, and the relative width of confidence intervals. This in turn will affect the monitoring of trends in health outcomes and health policy decision-making. It is concluded that the choice of age standard has political implications and the development and utilisation of an international indigenous population standard should be considered.</description>
			<link>http://www.ete-online.com/content/4/1/3</link>		
			<dc:creator>Bridget Robson, Gordon Purdie, Fiona Cram and Shirley Simmonds</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>Emerging Themes in Epidemiology 2007, 4:3</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 151</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2007-05-14</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1742-7622-4-3</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Emerging Themes in Epidemiology</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1742-7622</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2007-05-14</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
		
	<cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks"/>
	</cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
