Analytic perspective

Challenges in measuring measles case fatality ratios in settings without vital registration

K Lisa Cairns¹ , Robin Nandy² and Rebecca F Grais³

¹  Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, MS E-05, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA

²  Health Section, UNICEF, 3 UN Plaza, New York, NY 10017, USA

³  Epicentre, 8 rue Saint Sabin, Paris, France 75011

author email corresponding author email

Emerging Themes in Epidemiology 2010, 7:4doi:10.1186/1742-7622-7-4

Published:	19 July 2010

Abstract

Measles, a highly infectious vaccine-preventable viral disease, is potentially fatal. Historically, measles case-fatality ratios (CFRs) have been reported to vary from 0.1% in the developed world to as high as 30% in emergency settings. Estimates of the global burden of mortality from measles, critical to prioritizing measles vaccination among other health interventions, are highly sensitive to the CFR estimates used in modeling; however, due to the lack of reliable, up-to-date data, considerable debate exists as to what CFR estimates are appropriate to use. To determine current measles CFRs in high-burden settings without vital registration we have conducted six retrospective measles mortality studies in such settings. This paper examines the methodological challenges of this work and our solutions to these challenges, including the integration of lessons from retrospective all-cause mortality studies into CFR studies, approaches to laboratory confirmation of outbreaks, and means of obtaining a representative sample of case-patients. Our experiences are relevant to those conducting retrospective CFR studies for measles or other diseases, and to those interested in all-cause mortality studies.